senckađ
Group745
Group745
Group745
Group745
Group745
Group745
EDITION
Global
USA
UK
AUNZ
CANADA
IRELAND
FRANCE
GERMANY
ASIA
EUROPE
LATAM
MEA
Thought Leaders in association withPartners in Crime
Group745

S.O.S.: Meta's Metaverse Is Sinking

09/11/2022
Agency
New York, USA
844
Share
Amy Chen, director of experience at Siegel+Gale delves into the metaverse and looks at why people aren't clamouring to hang out in the space

Horizon Worlds has had a pretty rocky year. First an awkward selfie of Zuckerberg’s mid-00s Wii avatar in front of a mid-90s 8-bit render of La Sagrada Familia and the Eiffel Tower was released. Then Zuckerberg released a higher-fidelity fast-follow of his in response to the cyberbullying that rained down from the entire internet. And in his latest announcement at Meta Connect 2022, Horizon Worlds finally got some legs - literally. 

Whilst these sneak peeks are excellent fodder for the meme factory, they are decidedly less so for those serious about the viability of the metaverse. The longer these flubs continue without any promising value propositions or exciting experiences, the more likely the entire concept of the metaverse might go down with the Meta ship. No matter how much excitement Zuckerberg or Meta’s product team can ooze onstage, the fact is that there simply aren’t a whole lot of people clamouring to hang out in the space. 

A brief Meta history

Metaverse sceptics have joked about The App Formerly Known as Facebook ever since it renamed itself in October 2021, but still withheld their judgement from seeing what would happen to the space with Meta’s huge investment. But with all these odd blunders from one of the most highly-valued companies in the world, it’s starting to look like the sceptics were right, and Meta’s $15B investment may have taken a wrong turn at some point.

Here’s the thing - two schools of thought exist regarding the development of consumer tech: build the hardware or build the community. The aim of the former is to create cutting-edge software to attract the power users of the world whose interest and investment will drive its innovation. The latter aims to develop the ecosystem of apps, games, and experiences that make it so compelling it cannot be ignored by the general public.

The second approach is how Facebook became a household name. Facebook’s ascent was not one of techy bells and whistles, but it did promise access to something fresh, new, and exciting: a newsfeed. It didn’t really need many of its subsequent tech evolutions to be a hit. But Zuckerberg’s problem is that he’s been playing catch up to smaller, nimbler companies for a decade now. 

Zuckerberg has clearly chosen to prioritise hardware with the recent release of the Oculus Pro model, which retails at $1500 - five times the cost of the Oculus 2. He’s positioning it as an enterprise productivity solution, but a future where doing something in the metaverse is somehow better, easier, or more intuitive than doing that same thing in person or over a video conference seems far off.

How much would someone, even a business interested in its tech for productivity purposes, be willing to invest in an ecosystem that only just rolled out its legs? And what could Zuckerberg’s metaverse provide to businesses besides ever more immersive screens to get eye strain from and 3D keyboards that are less tactile and accurate than the ones that you’re already using IRL?

What’s next for the metaverse?

What the metaverse as a concept needs right now is excitement and inspiration, not in-progress development snapshots that show how far we are from that future, and expensive hardware by which we could ostensibly access it with. Even with the most cutting-edge headset, there’s no draw to Horizon Worlds. Consumers are not looking for an approximation of reality, but a new medium through which to access something either stunningly useful, or expansively novel.

With competing XR headset projects anticipated from Apple and Sony in the coming years, Zuckerberg is either farsighted in his focus, or committed to a product in a walled-garden innovation death spiral.

We, as creators, need to do what we do best - keep on imagining and building. Instead of being discouraged by the slow, plodding steps that Meta is showing us, recognise that there’s a whole lot of infrastructure that’s being built and tested through these painful public experiments. It’s going to be ugly before it becomes great.

Whether Meta’s Horizon Worlds stands the test of time remains to be seen, but even if it goes down like Google+, it’ll still be a study of technology, design, and user experience that will be carried forward through all the people who are working on it now.

How brands can succeed in the metaverse & beyond

If you create for a brand, for a movement, or simply for a future that you’d like to live in, the message is this: the metaverse isn’t solely Meta’s to own - it lies in the connective tissue between experiences that you or I can create. This connective tissue is being actively developed, and there are already alternate metaverses out there. Every digital experience you can imagine could be one. It’s only a matter of time before they’re interoperable, knit together into a community of immersive worlds you might browse like browsing the internet or social media today.

So, keep dreaming big. It’s only by pushing boundaries that we understand where they are.

SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
Work from Siegel+Gale
ALL THEIR WORK
SUBSCRIBE TO LBB’S newsletter
FOLLOW US
LBB’s Global Sponsor
Group745
Language:
English
v10.0.0