When a few high profile people left agency life
recently, my first thought was it couldn't be good for Adland. This
thought was reinforced whilst reading a study from the 4A's in
partnership with LinkedIn, which revealed turnover in advertising is
higher than related industries and growing at a faster rate, with people
moving to different agencies or leaving the business all together.
I
recently worked with Steve Back on a project for a client of ours.
Steve was previously a Creative Partner at a small agency and before
that a Chief Creative Officer at one of Australia's biggest agencies and
is now a director at Brilliant! Films. Our time together presented the
perfect opportunity to get a relevant perspective about this very
subject. We sat down and had a chat about the reasons behind his leap
and his new life outside agencies.
Have you always thought about moving into directing?
Ever
since I started as a creative. People joke about creatives aspiring to
write a book or film; I always had an ambition to start directing
because it felt like a pure form of creativity and I love ideas and
story telling.
What prevented you from moving sooner?
Being frank, it was a
struggle to get over the hump of a big salary every month. You become a
slave because you don't want to risk the pay packet, and so you
constantly feel compromised.
But I was also constantly searching
for satisfaction in agency life. People were critical of me shuffling
between jobs, but as a creative person there's an inherent desire to do
new things.
I moved around to satisfy the creative urge, by
trying different clients, agency structures and management teams. Even
when you're in charge, you don't always have the power to feed that urge
when and where you want to.
I had worked overseas, I had worked
for massive agencies with 600+ people, and I had come home and worked
for places much smaller. I felt like I'd covered the 'big' and the
'small' and everything in between, so I knew it was time to try
something new.
Why was this the right time to move?
After
25 years in the business, I was really motivated to get back to being a
true creative. I started as an art director, and my drive took me all
of the way to CCO, which, as it turns out, wasn't my cup of tea. When I
was leading a huge team, I felt like I had lost touch with the creative.
When
I came back to Australia and joined a smaller place, I was able to work
much more closely with clients and products, and it made me feel like I
was in the creative mix again. And I suppose ultimately the reason I
took the step to directing.
What's different in this role compared to your former career?
In
directing, it's still all about ideas. For me, success is based on the
quality of the idea and how you execute it; this is why directing
appeals to me.
The difference is the process, which now feels
simpler compared with agency life. People come with a solution that's
already been processed, and look to me for value. There's less steps
that I'm involved in, and I feel like I'm giving more enhanced creative
input, at the right time.
How has your own creative style adapted to this new career?
I
have a reputation for high standards, and in the past, I have struggled
with patience. Admittedly, I was hard about resolving the issues, but I
now take a more relaxed approach because I feel more confident about
what I'm doing.
What's the best thing about being 'on the other side'?
The
general excitement of sitting in other peoples' boardrooms and helping
other creative people in Australia is really exciting - we all want to
help solve problems.
What do you miss about agency life?
Being
part of a wider department was always fun, and being able to bounce
ideas around. There's nothing better than having a cool idea presented
to you and then selling it and bringing it to life.
What would you change about agency or industry processes?
The
way the industry operates is, you put your script out to three
directors to provide a treatment, and then you pick. I've never
understood this, because creatives have a pretty good idea about what
they want. This has a negative knock on effect, because directors want
to win the job, and so they have a fear about putting down something
that the agency doesn't like. I think it would be better to appoint your
director straight away and start from a place of true collaboration,
away from other agendas.
What skills are lacking in creative agencies? How should this be addressed?
For
an industry that says they're about collaboration, the skills to
communicate and operate in a collaborative way are lacking - at all
levels. I was guilty of this too.
Agenda, budgets and ego get in
the way of collaboration. I think, often, it's a confidence thing; if
people are out of their depth, they close down, but to collaborate you
need to be open-minded. This lack of confidence comes down to a lack of
training, which was why I was a big fan of exposing young people to the
process early.
The loss of creatives offers every agency the
opportunity to consider the optimum environment and blend of
personalities that might persuade that talent to stay put for a while.
However, I don't think its all doom and gloom. As the industry continues
to evolve, it's inevitable creative people will try different things
and it's a win for us all if they land in complimentary businesses. I
agree with Steve's point that collaboration is important. We need to
realise that ideas don't always have to come from within. Partnering
with people who have been responsible for some great thinking means
clients get even better value out of their agency relationship, and
ultimately results in better work, exciting meetings, and staff that
don't feel like they have to leave agency-land to fulfil their own
creative passions.