Over the past few years the ad industry has become saturated
with award shows, leaving agency professionals jaded as to the most valuable
place to spend their awards budget. There are few awards which hold universal
esteem across the globe but after 44 years The One Show remains one of them. Since
it was founded in the 1970s, The One Show has been attracting the world’s top
creatives and creative work to its non-profit show based in New York.
Maintaining such a high reputation for almost half a century
is pretty much unheard of. Priding themselves on the consistent high standards,
global reach and unique judging process, Kevin Swanepoel, CEO of The One Club,
José
Mollá,
Board Chairman of The One Club and Founder & CCO of The Community, and
board members Ted Royer, CCO of Droga5 and Pum Lefebure, Co-Founder & CCO
of Design Army reveal the unique process which has seen The One Show remain one
of the most highly respected global award shows in advertising.
‘The Best Work Needs
the Best Judges’
“When we ask for creatives from around the world to send us
their best work, to be judged in The One Show, we owe them the best creative
minds in the business,” explains Kevin Swanepoel. “After all – if the best are
not on the panel, then who are they to Judge?”
The process of building the perfect jury starts back with
the board members. Each summer nominations start, with past jurors and present
board members putting forward their suggestions. Past jury members of the last
three years can nominate, as can board members. The board collaboratively
approve the nominations, then vote for the final jurors by private ballot.
A Rigorous Selection
“It’s a very rigorous and democratic process of selection”
comments Lefebure. “We spend a lot of time looking through and making sure
there’s different geography, backgrounds and diversity to ensure that each jury
has a very comprehensive selection of professionals. The quality of the show
relies hugely on the quality of the jury. You want knowledgeable people who can
understand thinking on a high level of creative.”
With so many qualified nominators, the list can become
lengthy - as José explains: “Each board member nominates 20 creatives and the
international board nominates 10. Along with the past three years’ judges, a
total of approximately 2,000 creatives are nominated. We start formulating a
provisional jury from those creatives with multiple nominations. Bios and
profiles are put together from this provisional jury and then the Board
ratifies the jury. This year, The One Show has a total of 16 juries that will
total approximately 144 judges from 31 countries.”
With a process so detailed the
jury selection can last anywhere between two to three months. And the board
members are constantly tasked with re-checking the balance within the nominees
– ensuring diversity and relevance. “It starts in the summer with the
nominations and then by September we are looking at the final names,” explains Pum.
Top of Their Game
So what are the special ingredients that the board members
look for when voting for final jury member? At the forefront of the criteria is
that jurors are creating great work today.
“The One Show jurors are people actively working in the
business today, those who are at the top of their game, leading the industry in
innovation and original thinking,” says José.
“We want some of the most influential creatives in the
world,” adds Ted, “those who are doing work that’s getting noticed. We want
people who are really stretching the industry in different ways. It doesn’t
matter if they are well-known or not. It is the standard of their work that
counts. We like a good mix.”
Every Voice Counts
Once the nominees have been considered, the voting is done
by secret ballot. This democratic approach, removing undue influence, is one of
the most interesting features of The One Show jury.
“There is no jury foreman, which is untraditional,” explains
José. “A foreman can sometimes have undue influence on the way a jury votes.
With The One Show, you can talk amongst jurors but ultimately it’s a closed
vote. I think that’s quite unique. I’ve personally seen a lot of personality
sway on other award shows. We have often debated adding foremen to the juries but
decided that this structure is something that not only helps the show stand
out, but keeps it fair.”
Not having been on any other jury where work cannot be lobbied,
Pum says, “It’s very rare to go to an award show where there is limited and
controlled discussion. We want everyone to vote for who they think deserves to
win. With this process, you’re judging the work based on how you evaluate it - just
like if you were a consumer. It makes it entirely democratic so no one person
can swing the vote. Everyone is equal and votes autonomously.”
Giving Back
Not only is the judging process unique but The One Show’s
non-profit structure has other benefits that ensure it draws in the best work
and the best results.
“All the money that comes in to The One Show gets channelled
straight back in to scholarships, training programs and events that can get people
in touch with each other,” explains Royer. “We exist for the community 100%.
Hopefully we can keep doing what we’re doing for a long time.”
Considering the non-profit aspect as the main differentiator
between The One Show and other industry awards, José adds, “The goal of The One
Show is not to make money, but to raise the creative standards of our Industry.
It means decisions are made differently. Everything, even down to new categories
in the show are designed based on the latest trends in the market – not what
will generate the most cash. It is always evolving to stay relevant and help
define what innovation means today. As far as I see it, the show is the
pinnacle of conceptual thinking and well executed ideas. It’s a more meaningful
award and it celebrates the ‘doers’ of the work.”
“I’m proud to say that in every conversation that I have, The One Show is consistently put up there as the show with the highest standards and the best global reach,” concludes Ted. “It has maintained exceptionally high quality throughout the years.”