Does anyone actually like political advertising? During a
recent trip to Las Vegas I found myself bombarded with shouty attack ads with
all the subtlety of, well, Las Vegas. They were aimed at every level of
politics from District Attorney all the way up to the presidential race. Claim
and counter claim, sinister voice overs, wild allegations – an overload of
invective for someone who’s used to the (thankfully) more restrictive and staid
state of affairs in the UK. Even if the United States wasn’t going through a
political farce so outrageous that Armando Iannucci and the team behind Veep
wouldn’t touch it, I’d still feel deeply sorry for Americans. They can’t watch
the news or an episode of Modern Family without being shouted at. No one likes being shouted at.
Campaign fundraising is such a huge part of the US political
landscape, and while candidates are hoovering up every piece of media real
estate they can afford, I can tell you where money isn’t being spent –
creativity.
In the UK, the rules on spending and air time are incredibly
restricted. Each of the main parties gets a set amount of time on each of the
main terrestrial TV channels to set out their pitch – usually an
earnest-but-dull moving brochure of vague promises. The Green Party, with the
help of Creature of London, wisely decided to chase the laughs with their last
two efforts in the hope of circumventing the broadcast restrictions by going
viral online. Most of the time though, they’re ignorably dull. Even this week
the Labour party got a slap on the wrist and a £20,000 fine for out-of-budget
spending on (get this, non-Brits) a huge stone tablet of policy pledges.
But no such respite for the Americans. And the bad news for
advertisers is that not only are political ads deeply irritating on a personal
level, they are also a totally poisonous addition to the marketing media
landscape. J. Walter Thompson New York has just released a study that shows
that political ads sour viewers’ minds so completely that there’s a ‘hangover’
of negativity towards any ads that come directly afterwards. Ouch.
Here are the numbers – concentrate. Brand advertising is seen as 32%
less relevant, 29% less entertaining and 27% less appealing when it follows a
political ad. What’s more, brand reputation shrinks 34%, viewers’
perception of a product’s value declines by 32% and the perception of product
quality lurches 24% down.
These are sobering statistics –
particularly given the so-called ‘gold mine’ presented to media owners by the
presidential debates. The surge in eyeballs immediately before, during and
after the debates meant media owners could push up the price of ad slots duringthose primo windows. However this new research suggests that some of the non-political
brands that decided to splash out during the debates might have been wasting
their money.
Unfortunately, if this research does play out, the net
result could be that brands hold back on their TV media spend until after the
US election – and US telly addicts really will be faced with nothing but
wall-to-wall political ads with nary a cola commercial for respite. We’re
thinking of you.